The male that loses it with his wife’s endless nagging, and either beats or kills a woman, is as big as a surprise to her than anyone else. This is despite the claims of many women to know how everyone thinks and feels with a mere look, or due to her mystic powers. As this one male that she knows so well, and can endlessly push the envelope with, breaks her bubble to show women do not understand men as they like to think they do. So in such an action we see the one power women say they have with men disappear. This may be the outrage that really hurts such women, for all stats show women are more physically abusive than men and then recieve a rude awaking when they push too much ( as Sean Connery does). Now I have never hit a woman, but if you want to be an equal you shouldn't complain should you? Unless again you want not to be an equal (sometimes), for only mangina men would put up with another man saying things that women get away with. This is all about making men follow women's leadership based on her emotions.
In the present age when most of the real fears (that most women go on about) have been dealt with (or eliminated) by male inventions, should we not reevaluate fears and ask women to overcome the ones that are not real? No???
Should we de-ball men indirectly then, to assure any women that a man she chooses will come to follow her lead by following her fears and thus be controlled in all issues of daily life?
Or should the big male buffoon protector, who never passes on protecting any women- no matter how bad she is, now go to extraordinaire lengths to suppress men’s rights to make sure women aren’t scared and feel uncomfortable under any male's control in anyway? Of course this leads to totalitarianism of the matriarchal kind, with men in leadership positions, for women do not like to take the lead and always prefer to complain and get another to act on there behalf”, as Thomas Pollack rightly states. This has lead to effeminate tyranny and continues to get worse.
For this strange world to be at hand we would need a character that demanded we ignore logic, bravery: or the big; and instead follow her worshipping of emotions, mysticism: or the small. That would mean we must follow the Attention Whores.
The Age of the Attention Whore
I don’t know who coined the term, but he deserves the first medal given out for the language wars we have now. For me this is our Flight 93. The point when we finally fought back in the Gender word war for real. We had been playing at it until then (as we have been led by some manginas). "Feminazis" was rightly pointed out by Elder George as our acceptance of their language in our fighting back, as we have given up on labeling the other side by the worse maniacs of the last century the Femincommies (Communists/ socialists).
Here is a quick definition of an AW:
Attention Whore: A women that will emotional flip from scared to aggressive, argumentative to passive, from weakling to Amazonian reborn, (and very importantly in modern times) chivalrous demanding to equality demanding for the sole purpose of not being ignored or left alone. By not being ignored she can move those around her to do her bidding by the mere power of shutting up, or giving sex at the right time, or playing victim etc.
Is this not the our modern version of Cybele goddess? This would explain a lot as to why the whole of the West is so absolutely obsessed with paying attention to the sometimes the loudest most stupid ugly tarts around, as they ignore Mother Teresa types grounding out good deeds with a humbleness that is sacrilege to the Attention Whores (AW) promoters of Hollywood.
Why would non-effeminate men in government & business want this to happen? Checks and Balance in western nations has turned the establishment into yearning for a kind of political grease on the part of the voting public to allow them to move on there desires much easier. Two party political states getting all very emotional about the small issues over the big issues is all very petty and common today. Very much too, to the effeminates liking.
Men represent more checks and balances, while women and effeminate manginas represent the political grease to move things along much faster (allowing bureaucrats and leaders to be doing something, and get things they want). They have an addiction to effeminate emotions for this reason. Yes they fear things at the polls too, but they like to get emotional bills passed too (that have hidden ear marks galore).
Want an idea to move through quicker in the legislature, well get effeminates behind it and then its smooth sailing. Want people to follow you more easily, well get effeminates to follow you in a worshipping kind of way like groupies (good hair, and remind them of the boy they couldn’t get in school helps).
Real men want to move things along, and this has caused many an MRA to give up and become the fox instead of the fox and the grapes MRA not wanting unity after failing to get it. Yet to lead men is to earn trust in deeds, and too many men want others to follow them because they talk good, or because mommy made them think they were going to be something great, and therefore must have everyone come to see the sun shines out of their ass. Men who come home from war know the sun doesn't shine out of their ass, and everyone else should have secondary humbleness to these men.
Yes we should all follow logic first, but logic again doesn’t come out of your mouth. It comes out of deeds you do that succeed; period. If you are the logical leaders then do something and have it work and then move on to something else that works and so on. I guaranty men will come to your banner, for men like a winner. But if you want to only talk logic or have followers (that let you lead blindly), then don’t get mad at men that don’t.
Men like hammering it out at the right time and then moving on it. Not talking about it endlessly and then letting the one who looks like he is a leader with good hair lead. We have a whole generation of real men who follow real effeminate ideas of leadership. That's why all our political leaders look like a businessman with good hair, and western shrinks all try to look patriarchal and Freud-like (tweed jacket & beard), because they know they need to sound like a man and look like a man for effeminates. Yet they haven't succeeded have they?
When in power these leaders and their followers then tell bureaucrats to act on their behalf, for they haven’t had to do success stories in moving men, only in working through school and in business, where you pay large yearly salaries before anyone will do anything for you (which bureaucrats won’t do, for they aren’t paid by you), or in the school where you need the teachers' good graces and thus must brown nose (as you use in campaigning for office).
How do you move logical stubborn men who you can’t all pay large sums, or brown nose them to getting things fixed? This is why so many prefer effeminates and fail in the end.
Act and succeed and men will come to your banner, nothing else! All else is smoke and mirrors, and you will not win the men that will make it happen. Save your charisma for later, for men don’t want to be bedded by you? Save your hard selling of your ideas, for men aren’t buying hard sell, for it means you think they are stupid and indecisive. They are not. Business and cults hard sell because it wins effeminates into action because they are indecisive, stupid, love the attention, or are salesmen themselves (that like to see hard sell in action). None of these targets will win the men you need to win for real, which is more than heading an organization and getting dues.
When a child cries we instinctively come to see if the child is alright, so why not use the same method, says the AW, to draw attention to herself in a more advance technique than that of the child. Or better yet make the child and her wishes one in the same, so as to assure her wishes are the met! The spoiling of girls when they are young assures she learns that doing such things will bring the results required with just longer, harder tantrums in AW forum.
Oh…she longs for the time when daddy and mommy would do what she asked with a pout, scream, or claim of victimhood. Well it has arrived at the state level… congratulations! For those of you who thought that I wanted to go back to the time where we spoil girls this way you are sadly sadly mistaken... never! The tough quiet woman that wants to be equal and does her part slugging it out in a mine or on the front lines (feminist is deeds) is not my enemy, and the little brainless ninny that can’t do anything for herself is not my ally. Attention Whores are our enemy and they will use either of the chivalry/feminist spectrums to get everything for talking and game playing (which she loves to do anyway).
You can hate an AW, love an AW, but don’t ignore an AW! This would explain the need for calling strangers and acquaintances friends (or best friends), for this means she isn’t alone and can call on anyone at a moment's notice to be her best friend, if she can’t get one of the others in her bad books to do her bidding.
AWs are always able to join any group and pledge to follow its code, this is another way for them to not be alone. So an AW can carry on in any new forum, as before, for no one cares so much about the violations of any group code these days (if done indirectly of course). Please remember the effeminate idea "nobody is perfect" (small > big). Demanding the state come to her defense with lawyers, judges, case workers just gives her people to talk to. Fathers can’t see their children, even just a short period, because he won't talk to her about her feelings and he may take or convince the children that she is not perfect, and thus remove another person for her to talk to.
This kind of woman doesn’t wish to be alone for that means she has to have the child 24/7! The need to cheat on ones hard working husband, or soldiering lad who defends us all, makes total sense too, for SHE DOESN’T WISH TO BE ALONE!
If such a military woman’s husband or son dies the media needs to pay attention to her and her feeling over the wounded or dead soldier, for she is the victim it would seem? Watch and see what the media does as mothers feelings seem more important than the dads, for the dad are somehow less newsworthy for they are more stoic in their pain. So therefore their pain doesn't sell or translate to others??? What ever that means!
There are few numbers of women given jail time for equal crimes for jail is all about dealing with being alone for most of the day, or to live in close courters with someone that might act like a male and directly kick the shit out of you for the slightest of BS. Which is all so much more brutish than indirectly destroying a man’s life from a safe distance with the help of the state. So it should come as no surprise that feminists, as of late, have been arguing that women don’t need be sent to prison at all! The motivation of feminists is to not allow any AW to be either by themselves for large part of the day, or even worse in solitary confinement "ever."
Want to sell an effeminate anything, then tell them if they buy product A they will not be alone as everyone will want to be with them. They will buy the same products in different colors even though their room is filled to bursting with the same versions of the same basic thing. Being in fashion means being able to be with others and be hip and swinging, and therefore not alone again! Some imaginative person, with a streak of risking being alone, comes up with a new style and the whole world comes to copy this kind of imaginative one for a few decades (if they are lucky for effeminates are fickle). Whoopee the fashion world is so imaginative!
This explains why many females want to go to school and be with others and be given jobs over men, but not actual spend decades focused on the task at hand by yourself at a job. I'd guess about well over half of all women are like this. Hence the urge to get married after school or a few years at a job.
Yet she doesn’t wish to be alone at home talking to a child that won’t understand her and do her bidding for many years to come, so she passes on the child thing (unless all her friends have babies that is, can't be the odd woman out).
With nannies, daycare (while not working at an outside job), babysitting or just generally not really keeping an eye on the little ones very well, an AW can have a child as an accessory, but call herself a pure natural mother (or lady) and have no one sully her noble ability to let nature give the power of birth to her. A women’s job, for being a good mother, comes after the birth for nature does everything else till that point. A woman can only wreck a birth by drinking or drug use now. What kind of skill is that to go praising a woman for?
A baby is a kind of cage for women, that will lock an AW into caring for another with no real talk back (a kind of AW withdraw). Poor dear! So every action taken to put the child first is such a dramatic event! She took the child to school, turn on the washing machines, and had a bad hairdresser at the salon, don’t you know. It’s amazing to listen to them go on!
AW businesses with too many effeminates in management slows down companies as things get to be too much talk shop or gossipfests about stroking egos on the way to the top. That is between outbursts of why the AW hasn’t been given the keys to management for her "people skills" of course.
When things get old hat at the office, when there is no revolving door of employees and no new cute man joining the company, we start to see AW’s fear of being alone really come forth. An AW realizes her magic is being lost. The musical chairs of workers is highly inefficient to change workers so often, for the price of retraining new workers and lost skills eats into the lower salary, but it is exciting to meet a new person to talk about themselves (yet again) for effeminates. So this constant practice of changing employees is somehow gained across the board in business.
Or when a woman accepts she is not charming enough anymore to get a male (or fertile enough to have a child in her 40s) she talks about getting a cat or dog, so she isn’t alone yet again!
While the love of the talking lawyer jobs or TV programs, with the number of lawyers in our society say as compared to Japan, is staggering as sophist rhetoric comes natural to women and their love of wearing expensive suits and legislating from the bench has reach ever growing levels.
So there we have it, in strong dosage or light dosage, women who don’t wish to be alone and will create as much as a ruckus to get attention as we can bear without getting the full weight of society coming down on her to end this age of the Attention Whore.
Are men not bigger, stronger, smarter, braver, self-made in wealth, hornier and capable of being alone when things need to be done? Sure, we can see where this came from as men hunted by themselves, or in groups, where it paid to be quiet and focus on the target and not digress endlessly on to your situation.
Women needed to huddle together for protection in the past, and as the writer for ACLAF pointed out quite clearly must go to washrooms together even today (for in the past it was a defensive measure). Though today there are no predators waiting in the washrooms to pick one off every day or so as they gossip, groom and pose endlessly, it is still an instinct is it not?
The issue of cooperation is one under debate, though I don’t know why MRAs think women and the establishments are more cooperative. Both women and the establishment are more cooperative when things don’t need to get done as much, and give large amounts of cash to get very little done. It is men that cooperate much better to get real works done. The problems with MRA disunity stems from culturally shell-shocked fathers, men and boys with not the funds to get anything done. Along with men and boys brought up by single mothers who make them into Mangina-like types (in full or just in part), or over competitive men who prefer locking horns over getting anything done. A kind of Monty Python, "I'd like to buy an argument" man.
I would say we are doing quite well. Yet if you want to complain and get others to do things for you for nothing in return, then I will not stop you being like an effeminate, but will call a spade-a-spade.
Most women can’t simply say to men, honestly, that men have all these better traits and deserve a thank you to their sex for the great world females live in at present (the best one to date). That would involve humbling oneself and admitting the other sex is better built to lead with reason or logic. This would mean many further steps down for the Attention Whores goddess from her Cybele pedestal, and any further requests for support would have to take the long list provided to date by men in mind, which would clip her wings real quick.
So best to blame men for all that is bad in the world (small > big), as they live in the world that is all but the best of the worlds to date, if one wants more from men that is!
Like the Spartan women modern women and effeminates can't seem to do the barest of deeds to allow the society to have balance. Again strange for the sex that claims to be better balancers
Therefore for these effemainte states to go on bigger, stronger, smarter, braver, self-made wealthier, hornier and less emotional males must be deconstructed, or made from something big into something small.
Ask a woman, “Which is healthier, eating an apple or eating a rock” with no pressure on her she will say, “an apple.” Take her out of her element and make her feel that if she says “apple” she might get into trouble with others by loosing her comfortable friendships, wealth, objects and even be injured and the answer becomes “the rock” much more often than a full grown healthy male by leaps and bounds. So making small > big is the first sophist trick in the world there likely ever was, and if not started by women it is in fact likely women are the ones who used it more than any others from the very beginning. At present we are getting this small > big message virtually screamed at us in the media in all forms.
Once you accept this small > big the other deconstructions of turning polite niceties into the be all and end all focus comes fast and much easier to swallow. In fact when you accept small > big the rest of the changes in thinking can become just silly semantics, for the battle was lost with the first upside down call. When a man lets a small action taken by a effeminate (usually applied with an argument) chip way at a important issue by making this small > big, for peace and quiet in the home, he has really begun the long fall. For this is how effeminates work, and they will go at such issues in the same way until won.
When some boy beats up another boy, a boy can instead of digging down deep to deal with the next fight can now act like a girl and claim he doesn’t need to fight directly, for he is superior for doing things indirectly (by telling the teacher, lawyer, PC police or just about anyone to deal with the problem for him). He can win by getting the other boy in trouble, and thus be undefeated in his own mind. With the rationale that, "The other boy is too stupid to use others to get his way." Such an effeminate boy keeps his positive self-image at the expense of his chance of manhood (and later chance at a honor code). So easy it is to let boys become effeminate and so hard it is for an effeminate to become a man, and then even harder to become an honorable man.
Psychology shows this as not crossing over from the mother and her ways to become a man. Girls don't have to cross over to be a woman, as boys do, and have no idea of what this is or how to do it, for even Spartan mothers had the right to kill a son, but were not held accountable (killed) for not making a boy overcome his fears.
Despite males not having good language skills we have so many words for this kind of effeminate (homeboy, mamma's boy, mother complex, boy toy, pussy, pup out, girlie man, pussy-whipped and more). These words have the effect of making boys overcome this challenge, challenging the accusers right to use the term with him, or accept his role as an effeminate or convince himself in succeeding in others ways (to over come the fact he can't deal with fear in any manageable way like a woman). A man can overcome this issue and move on to succeed in other fields as well.
Yet with single mothers and effeminate ideas we are coming forth with both effeminacy run amuck and exaggerated forms of pseudo-manliness. Examples of exaggerated forms, or boyish forms of this, are males that always fight too much, bedding women in front of others, using steroids to be bigger, and bragging or talking too much about your deeds to anyone who will listen.
We must still look at one more deconstruction (though they are endless) in the fact that of all of women’s indirectness lays another fundamental point, for it is important that we see it clearly. That idea or lie is that there are women that are better than men in certain professional fields. Once a new area becomes old hat (and note, “less dangerous”) women have been known to take it up and succeed.
No sooner does man create something then woman proceeds to take it from him, picking his pocket and subverting his creations to her own use (witness the growth of feminism on the internet if you have any doubts.) This spread of feminism has left an odd dichotomy in our society; wherever women directly predominate, there things are at their worst, wherever men predominate, things are at their best. In general, business, science and technology, the military, and other fields that serve as means to ends, and therefore are dominated by men, are among the best in the world (though the entrance of women into these fields is taking its toll.) In areas where people receive a more direct benefit, and therefore are controlled by members of the selfish sex, we find in family relationships a high divorce rate and frequently unruly children. Using their dominance in personal relationships as a base, the influence of women has spread throughout the whole social fabric and up into political life. The result is some of the worst policies ever enacted by human society. In the professions, the takeover of teaching by women has solidified their mind control over the population along with their control of the media. This has led to declining test scores even while money has been poured into the educational system. And as for the values learned, they can are considered at a high point if a boy remembers to bring a condom while on a date. –Thomas Pollack
Dysfunctional boys from dysfunctional households are compared with new feminist icons, and when one says wait a minute these boys you are comparing are brought up under female leadership (which includes persecution of them at all levels) we are called misogynists. All of this is defended with critical theory, rhetoric, sophistry, French deconstructionism, which are from the women’s preferred practice of making small > big.
Why Women Don’t Want Children
Childbirth is still risky
Aside from childbirth still being a risky act, as complications set in, we need to see the fear of having a baby is still often brought up for many women in conversations, despite it lessening dangers day-by-day. How on earth can women fear childbirth after so long at the task? Unless fear so trumps their nature that even childbirth becomes a rationalized fear to gossip about for attention!
The fear for women, who have kids, loosing their figure (bigger hips saggy chest etc.), is a separate issue, but comes back to fear once again. If you are ruled by fear then these issues are not small and unimportant.
Kids Take Women’s Wealth Away
Next the issue of women passing on their wealth attainment to the kids, which is against their wealth gathering ways in life too, while men have had no point when they weren't expected to give the other sex the gathered wealth, women are meant by nature to hold off till much later to share the wealth and resources with others much more.
The fewer kids that one has the more wealth effeminates will gain for themselves as they outlive hard working men. Wealth in divorces goes the woman's way, even though they are said to be equals and often don't have any kids?? We have heard for sometime that men gain more in the work environment, but studies show when women work the same length of time and don’t take off time for more vacations and for children she earns equal or more than a man. It is the fact that women want equal wages for less time input or for less skill that is now become all too apparent to MRAs in the West. Tennis is the latest example as 3 sets gets you the wages of 5 men's sets, and that doesn't answer why equal women want separate but easier systems as a kind of gender aparthied when it suits them.
Kids Cause Women to Look Bad
Taking on kids is another factor in increasing a woman’s looks (you are giving me gray hairs), as increased aging is now a deterrent for women having kids. Anyone witnessing all the debates and disciplining that goes on in child rearing will find enough rationalizations to say, "why take on the hassle." Yet for men again we are expected be made of sterner stuff and are expecting women to handle something without trying to be the good cop to the kids at all times. Still "wait for your father to get home" is passing the buck to be the nice cop, and thus have the kids like you more over dad and what is best for them.
Laziness
I have heard of surveys that show we have more time to do other things compared to our past ancestors, but as compared to Susie-homemakers and her expectations, in a culture that says women can have it all, I’m not so sure this matters much to women’s expectations. Each generation is getting lazier despite records being broken in sports, for we are becoming more effeminate 'watchers' than 'doers'. Women, as the head of households, are thus getting lazier and making the children lazier with each generation that goes by. So this affects women’s willingness to have kids, as their nature is lazier, as the average physical examination of the population will tell you.
Weakness in strength is always looked at in isolation. If you are weak physically then you are bound to fear more and overcome things less directly, for you have less strength that comes from practicing overcoming things in your way, for indirectness often means with less energy. If you are weak physically you will not be able to gauge issues and test mettle either. So when we say women are weaker physically we should really include a host of others issues related to this fact, that are now politely left out of discussions. These effeminate facts of life are being passed on to boys in single mother households, as compared to a hyperactive boy with a father in the home. Dads teach hyperactive boys through using their energy, while effeminates try to slow the boys down, which has taken on the use of drugs now is ver sad. Naps in pre-school are for the girls and the women teachers, and are not for the boys bouncing off the walls.
Adoption
All these abortions we have now are really saying for many women, "I don’t want saggy tits", as can be seen in dangers with chest implants not swaying women from getting some false titties. Ancient Roman prostitutes would toss there babies into the sewers for they knew they would not be able to continue to gain funds and their lifestyles would suffer if they had a child.
In the rural environments children mean someone to talk to and help with work, but in the urban environment they are more of the opposite. So why can't we admit the obvious? Adoption is more popular with women for this reason (though I have no information to prove this), for they get the kids with adoption with no body deformatus. Surely nature would drive women to have their own, unless they prize looks more than this pull of nature more. Yet the adoption has become the cause celeb, as a nose job. Nature has encouraged this by prolonging youth.
Women Are Not of Nature
(They hid in the cave, remember)
You must ignore the earth mother BS, for they are ruled by fear. Scary bears outside the door means she hates nature. Camping with no toilet and she hates nature again. Whoever started this idea of women, as more in touch with nature must have been one of these artsy-fartsy types trying to bed a female again? Bullocks!
Clothes Don’t Make the Women
(They Lose Funds & Time for the Kids)
Now, expensive attractive clothes means keeping yourself in the game, and that means kids get less attention & funds. If your wife dressed nicely at home only, then she would be saying she loves you and doesn’t care what others think. Yet it is the opposite. So kids get in the way of more clothes and jewelry, so they must not be brought into this world (for women need lots of grooming and clothes).
Kids Don’t Allow Women’s Preferred Lazy Vacations
Once you have kids you can’t travel as much. Just look at chick flicks, romantic novels, and I see traveling for romance, as opposed to traveling to study archeological digs, climb mountains, camp etc. You are always hearing about women wanting freedom, to not be placed in a cage. Fathers protect girls from many threats and then get the label of "control freaks". If women and girls were kickboxing every weekend and dad came along to watch I think dad would let the cage door open a bit more. Yet instead it is girls one-track mind of "people skills" (as if the world hasn’t changed from the time of women in caves, where peace was kept with a lot of talk). Because girls and women have people skills daddykins must let her stay out at a frat party till 3:00! Women don’t learn to be like men in the wild, they bring the cave to the world and call this advancement.
Fear Trumps Most Women’s Lives
You notice when a women wants to keep a man in her life she will get pregnant, supposedly on the pill. In this case they have the fear of losing a man they desire, over having the ill effects of having a child without a father who wants to be around. So lying to the person they are supposed to love more than life itself (very strange putting your life on the line to lie about bringing something into the world that you are also going to claim is more important than life itself) is odd isn't it? Here we have a battle of fears, and not a love of kids or a love of a man, at least not enough to change a woman’s ways. Yet if a selfish married man doesn’t want a child, then a fearful women will not have one if she wishes to not be alone too, instead of saying I want children and I'm going for another man who does too. So we have twice the chance that a couple won’t have a child, for fear rules the woman. And as for those women that have a child without a father, well others almost always pick up the tab. And such kids from fatherless families don't have kids at the same average as traditional families?
Brutes < Weasels
Women tolerate weasel behavior and characters much more than brutish behavior (or characters) because they identify with the weasels motivation and under the surface methods. Women relationships with others during the period where they are not ready to mate are centered on finding other like-minded effeminate types. A BBC survey found that women would change their effeminate preferring ways when looking for a provider, protector and impregnator during the minority period during ovulation. What this means is nature doesn’t wish women hanging around males too much for she is bound to risk death, or such like, by say "being around bikers all the time." Likewise gay hair dressers, Manginas, men who want to be touchy feely types, kids, other women, and of course men who wish to get sex in exchange for taking care of other men's kids will all be welcomed during these same women's majority cycle where everything must be turned into effeminacy to make a woman more comfortable.
This survey shows that women are forces for turning everything into effeminacy, and since the urban environment is more luxurious and thus allows women more free time, we allow them to turn the house, neighborhood, town, province and world into a warm fuzzy thing (that may change at any time when she goes into ovulation again). Also when such an effeminate is scared the effeminate world they have created is no good anymore, and yet no changing of their ways is demanded by anyone. As soon as a threat is gone it is back turning things into effeminacy.
In this way effeminates are of 2 minds as they are meant to change every month and prefer effeminates most of the time. So it will be good for leaders to make society effeminate-like most of the time, for most women and children (who are closer to a woman in fears) will be happier in such a state. Yet to do this they need to suppress men and boys at all times except when they need them to do all the dangerous, wealth creating and imaginiative stuff that makes our culture so great. Thus the state is ruled by foxes or weasels that must use the lions, and not let the lions use them, or make things equal and honoarble amongst men.
No One Likes to be Regarded as a Weasel!
You will never see anyone say they are a proud weasel. Instead they once again put on verbal stripes like all animals and try to hide and do as the following:
1) I’m not weasel caught in the act of being a weasel, but (flash the child-like biting of the lip like Clinton) but a cutie who has not been thinking about what I’ve been doing and kind of stumbled into being a weasel. It's not my fault for I’m still quite young and don’t know any different, because I can look child-like when caught.
2) I’m not a man bedding women whose boyfriend is at the front, but a stud that is getting to bed lots of lonely women who need someone to listen to their sad stories, and let them be attention whores as their boyfriends die, or are hurt physically or mentally on all our behalf. Including me the stud draft dodger.
3) I’m not taking over 50 % in tax revenues, from people I don’t know, to fund my social experimentations that I learned at weasel loving schools with a political agendas that rationalizes threats of other people's fears. I'm a humanist who wants to stop direct actions by males who are my betters.
4) I’m not a weasel making it legal to build my attractiveness to AW over more manly men. I am in an intellectual heavy weight countering heavy weight political moves by my political enemies in a non-violent, refined and cultured way.
5) I kiss babies and give women the best of both worlds for I’m a gentleman and want women to continue to spend men’s remaining money on themselves and my agenda. I’m a giver to women, not a taker from men.
I could go on but I think you get the picture.
The Worst of Both Worlds is Coming for Women
(Instead of the Best)
Chivalry hasn’t been abandoned. Movies, religions, women, traditional men and male’s instincts all push for men to act chivalrously. The problem for those who take glee in this is the fact that men are known to control their emotions and thus this doesn’t bode well for those who want chivalry to remain, despite they’re strange claim to wanting equality. The coming death of general chivalry to the general female population (while undoubtedly remaining with good marriages) is taking such a slow rate to change due to the factors stated earlier, and not out of a male stupidity to continue to be blindsided by this con game.
It is of note that once the general idea is gone or abandoned, by males, it will certainly die for a long time or for good. For males will remember this for some time to come, and if their genes and fatherly skills are being passed on, chivalry will be given a deathblow at the general social level.
What we have now is not equality for real, and not chivalry for real, but the best of both for women, and worst of both worlds for men.
If physical force is a male trump card than full sexuality is a female one. We are asked to constantly disarm males’ direct strength and let fly the woman’s trump card in this culture, and this is a simple easy way to see what kind of culture we live in.
Why does chivalry remain in this equal world? If it is done to just be a nice person, then why are women not doing the same as men? How many women have held the door open for you? How many women have paid for your dinner? How many women have bought you more expensive gifts than you have to them for every occasion? How many times have women taken the garbage out late at night for you? How many times have women held their tongues at gossipfest to be chivalrous to other men and women not present? So we should be agreed, women may want men being chivalrous still, but there is no solid proof that women are heading to return chivalry on their part in equal portion (or even excess portions as it should be a down payment for men's past efforts). Most to many effeminates want the mix to keep men in confusion, and thus paying endless attention to the attention whore of our lives.
The leadership of government knows men are checkmated in this system too, and thus want nothing to do with lion men getting organized. This is why they are so heavy handed with the rhetoric of Nazis under every blade of grass.
Why does honor not remain undeconstructed as chivalry does? Why are equality and old fashion ideas constantly mixed up at the leadership level, the national level, the cultural level and even the personal level?
How on earth can every man learn every woman’s mix of the old and the new at the local level and also PC world versions in each country, and get much of anything else done in there lives?
Forget "eating" there is some women in the shipping department that wants you to treat her like an equal by making her carry the boxes by herself, but not test her thin skin with male locker room banter? You fool, where are your priorities, every women needs to have you understand her, no matter what the cost!
The simple answer to all of this is we have the extension of the preferred romantic phase of women’s lives in our societies. Women are trying to hold on to when their outsides make everyone cater to her wishes, and nature (in its quest to make us more intelligent by extending puberty) has allow AW to continue immaturity indefinately at the male tax payers expense and body count. They can’t accept that they have much less time to play this peacock game, even though they addicted to it, and real men don’t really care for it very much (just as they hate chick flicks). They just want the sex and be done with all the other strutting BS.
How do we Behead the Medusa?
Priorities in Order of Importance:
1st: Truth
2nd: Honor
3rd: Loyalty
Want details? Buy the book!
